From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261333AbULMTyC (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:54:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262287AbULMTwJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:52:09 -0500 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:58868 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262278AbULMTfU (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:35:20 -0500 Subject: Re: dynamic-hz From: john stultz To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Pavel Machek , Con Kolivas , lkml In-Reply-To: <20041213110852.GQ16322@dualathlon.random> References: <20041211142317.GF16322@dualathlon.random> <20041212163547.GB6286@elf.ucw.cz> <20041212222312.GN16322@dualathlon.random> <41BCD5F3.80401@kolivas.org> <20041212234256.GK6272@elf.ucw.cz> <20041213104321.GB7340@elf.ucw.cz> <20041213110852.GQ16322@dualathlon.random> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1102966592.1281.397.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:36:32 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 03:08, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:43:21AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Doing lot less per timer tick is not going to help much... You cpu > > I also doubt we can do significantly less per timer tick. Well, I'd like see the timeofday timekeeping work reduced so we don't do it every tick. Instead it would become a scheduled event that goes off every second or so. thanks -john