From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>
To: schauer@acousta.at
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IBM Patents
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:25:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1106040356.17119.11.camel@tara.firmix.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1106037430.7191.5.camel@FC3-bernhard-1.acousta.local>
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 09:37 +0100, Bernhard Schauer wrote:
> > And almost all of them are pure software-patents and probably prior art.
> > Thus they are - at least in Europe - not relevant and actually illegal
> > if you believe in the current European patent law as defined by the
> > European Patent Convention (see §52(2) for details).
>
> Hopefully nothing will change in future! Except the European Patent
In terms of above statement, yes. It actually needs means to seriously
control the EPO and national POs - there absolutely no independent
justice (similar to other democratic systems) there.
Nevertheless the evil propaganda was working since years to get the
decision makers (read: law and politics folks with (almost) no knowledge
of "programming", "software" and/or copyright/author's rights) to
believe in "monopolies on ideas are good for small companies".
And there are other forces pushing in that direction but without prove
I won't speak about it ....
> Office should stop to give away software patents (even if they have no
> legal basis).
>From a juristical point of view (and "they" are actually saying that)
they are "legal" (since they are granted) - even there are severe
concerns (read: there are not fulfilled in any way) about the
preconditions.
However the POs get more money from granted patents than from not
granted ones (for actually less work - for the patent proving person it
is more work to seriously explain a declined patent instead of - more or
less - simply accepting it) and the POs have absolutely no risk. Guess
what will happen .....
Bernd, stopping now since it is quite off-topic here
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-18 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-17 13:44 linux-os
2005-01-17 14:45 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-01-18 8:37 ` Bernhard Schauer
2005-01-18 9:25 ` Bernd Petrovitsch [this message]
2005-01-18 11:04 ` James Bruce
2005-01-18 11:24 ` Chris Lingard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1106040356.17119.11.camel@tara.firmix.at \
--to=bernd@firmix.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schauer@acousta.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®