mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
To: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@Dell.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] modules: add version and srcversion to sysfs
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:38:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1106757530.13004.220.camel@winden.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050126140935.GA27641@lists.us.dell.com>

On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 15:09, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:22:29AM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 January 2005 07:05, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > Module:  Add module version and srcversion to the sysfs tree
> > 
> > why do you need this?
> 
> a) Tools like DKMS, which deal with changing out individual kernel
> modules without replacing the whole kernel, can behave smarter if they
> can tell the version of a given module.

They can look at the modules in /lib/modules/$(uname -r).

> The autoinstaller feature,
> for example, which determines if your system has a "good" version of a
> driver (i.e. if the one provided by DKMS has a newer verson than that
> provided by the kernel package installed), and to automatically
> compile and install a newer version if DKMS has it but your kernel
> doesn't yet have that version.

I find the autoinstaller feature quite scary.

> b) Because tools like DKMS can switch out modules, you can't count on
> 'modinfo foo.ko', which looks at
> /lib/modules/${kernelver}/... actually matching what is loaded into
> the kernel already.  Hence asking sysfs for this.

DKMS doesn't manage loading modules, does it? If it does, then at least
it shouldn't; that's even more scary than the autoinstaller. From the
point of view of the kernel, the modules relevant for the running kernel
are those below /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/. If DKMS replaces things
there, it'd better keep proper track of what it did.

I never want to see DKMS try to remove a module from the running kernel
or insmod a new one.

> c) as the unbind-driver-from-device work takes shape, it will be
> possible to rebind a driver that's built-in (no .ko to modinfo for the
> version) to a newly loaded module.  sysfs will have the
> currently-built-in version info, for comparison.
>
> d) tech support scripts can then easily grab the version info for
> what's running presently - a question I get often.

That's something you can do entirely in userspace by looking at the *.ko
files.

Regards,
-- 
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
SUSE Labs, SUSE LINUX GMBH


  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-26 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20050119171357.GA16136@lst.de>
     [not found] ` <20050119172106.GB32702@kroah.com>
     [not found]   ` <20050119213924.GG5508@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]     ` <20050119224016.GA5086@kroah.com>
     [not found]       ` <20050119230350.GA23553@infradead.org>
     [not found]         ` <20050119230855.GA5646@kroah.com>
     [not found]           ` <20050119231559.GA10404@lists.us.dell.com>
     [not found]             ` <20050119234219.GA6294@kroah.com>
2005-01-26  6:05               ` Matt Domsch
2005-01-26  9:22                 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2005-01-26 14:09                   ` Matt Domsch
2005-01-26 16:38                     ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2005-01-27 17:03                       ` Matt Domsch
2005-01-27 17:41                       ` Bill Davidsen
2005-01-26 14:32                 ` Paulo Marques
2005-01-27  2:10                   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1106757530.13004.220.camel@winden.suse.de \
    --to=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=Matt_Domsch@Dell.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome