From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261839AbVAaIYk (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 03:24:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261841AbVAaIYk (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 03:24:40 -0500 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([205.233.218.70]:29965 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261839AbVAaIYf (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 03:24:35 -0500 Subject: Re: inter-module-* removal.. small next step From: Arjan van de Ven To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bunk@stusta.de In-Reply-To: <1107132112.783.219.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> References: <20050130180016.GA12987@infradead.org> <1107132112.783.219.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:24:29 +0100 Message-Id: <1107159869.4221.53.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.1 (++++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on canuck.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO 1.1 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 00:41 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 18:00 +0000, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > Hi, > > > > intermodule is deprecated for quite some time now, and MTD is the sole last > > user in the tree. To shrink the kernel for the people who don't use MTD, and > > to prevent accidental return of more users of this, make the compiling of > > this function conditional on MTD. > > Please get the dependencies right -- it's not core MTD code, but the NOR > chip drivers and the old DiskOnChip drivers which use this. that's just a slightly more finegrained thing, not sure if it's worth going that deep, esp since it become 2 deps not one, making a bigger mess than needed. now if one of the two can go (obsolete) it'd make sense