mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Interrupt starvation points
Date: 11 Feb 2005 09:36:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1108143402.21935.83.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050211173025.GA17387@elte.hu>

On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 09:30, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> i'm wondering what the best approach would be. Right now if
> DIRECT_PREEMPT is enabled [it's disabled currently] and a higher-prio
> task has been woken up we switch to it without ever enabling interrupts
> again. Re-enabling interrupts during schedule() will reduce irq
> latencies but will lengthen critical sections.


	Yeah, it's a trade off .. The longest points that I observed involved
kernel threads like desched . Things that the scheduler() regularly
wakes up anyways. I would imagine there is an upper bound on the number
of tasks the scheduler can wake up.

Daniel


  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-11 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-11 17:05 Daniel Walker
2005-02-11 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11 17:36   ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2005-02-11 20:04 ` Russell King
2005-02-11 21:52   ` Daniel Walker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1108143402.21935.83.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com \
    --to=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®