From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Joe Korty <joe.korty@ccur.com>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:37:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109180222.6290.89.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050223171015.GD10256@austin.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 11:10 -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:54:06AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > > Otherwise, a preempt attempt in get_user would not be seen
> > > until some future preempt_enable was executed.
> >
> > True. I guess we should have a "preempt_check_resched()" there too. That's
> > what "kunmap_atomic()" does too (which is what we rely on in the other
> > case we do this..)
>
> Ok, this is getting complex enough to warrant get_user_inatomic(),
> which means adding it to every arch's uaccess.h.
>
> Below patch does so. Unfortunately I don't have a Viro setup with cross
> compilers for nearly every arch, so I can't make sure it doesn't break
> anything. But since I pasted the same code everywhere it shouldn't.
I hate to do this to you, but get_user is a bit horrible in that it is
an untyped interface. Fixing it is hard (ugh) but when adding new
variants should/could we consider to please make it a typed (eg inline
and not a define) interface please ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-23 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-22 19:06 Olof Johansson
2005-02-22 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-22 21:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-02-22 21:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-02-22 21:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-22 21:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-02-22 22:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-22 22:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-02-22 23:08 ` Greg KH
2005-02-22 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-22 21:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-02-22 21:19 ` Olof Johansson
2005-02-22 22:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-02-22 21:19 ` Chris Friesen
2005-02-22 21:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-02-22 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-22 22:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-02-22 22:42 ` Olof Johansson
2005-02-22 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-22 23:23 ` Olof Johansson
2005-02-23 14:49 ` Joe Korty
2005-02-23 15:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-23 17:10 ` Olof Johansson
2005-02-23 17:37 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2005-02-23 18:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-02-23 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-23 18:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-02-23 19:12 ` Olof Johansson
2005-02-23 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-24 0:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-02-23 18:37 ` Olof Johansson
2005-02-22 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-22 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-23 11:39 ` David Howells
2005-02-23 16:22 ` Olof Johansson
2005-02-23 18:44 ` David Howells
2005-02-23 11:42 ` David Howells
2005-02-23 11:24 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1109180222.6290.89.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=joe.korty@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®