From: Amol <amol@teneoris.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Initrd and Initramfs
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:40:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109830227.4063.60.camel@amol.teneoris.com> (raw)
Hi,
For an embedded developers perspective, Is there any other advantage of
using initramfs over initrd apart from RAMFS benefits over RAMDISK ?
Please CC me
Thanks
Amol
next reply other threads:[~2005-03-03 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-03 6:10 Amol [this message]
2005-03-03 6:30 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1109830227.4063.60.camel@amol.teneoris.com \
--to=amol@teneoris.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®