From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>
To: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@utah-nac.org>
Cc: gene.heskett@verizon.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: United States Patent: 6,862,609]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:26:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109845583.28561.19.camel@tara.firmix.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4226927A.6010107@utah-nac.org>
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 21:28 -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> >On Wednesday 02 March 2005 21:36, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> >>Another Linux patent.....
... and another - AFAICS obvious - trivial ("prior art") patent (but I'm
not fluent in patent quak, I'm just a simple systems engineer).
And one more reason to sent the European software patent directive
simply to hell, clarify in §52.2 to not patentability of "software"
discarding the word play of the patent attorneys and offices and get
into the head of the folks of the EPO (with whatever means are
necessary).
> >And that pretty much says it. Assigned to the Canopy Group. So SCO
> >will have yet another lawsuit to threaten us with. If they survive
Apparently Canopy Group/SCO/... are not of the front of innovation since
"what is new on a RAID system in any way in 2005"?
> >the thrashing I've Been Moved will give them at the end of the day.
> >
> The way to fight the patents is for Linux developers to file their own
> and start putting down stakes.
Or simply drop the whole patent system as such. Apparently it is only
abused to make money of the inventions of others and for sure does not
help innovation as such in any way (it may help the lawyers, offices and
companies in that area - patent utilisation - to get rich but that area
has nothing to do with innovation).
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-03 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-03 2:36 Jeff V. Merkey
2005-03-03 3:27 ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-03 4:28 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-03-03 6:21 ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-03 10:03 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-03-03 10:31 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-03-03 11:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-03 15:42 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-03-04 19:46 ` Tom Vier
2005-03-03 10:26 ` Bernd Petrovitsch [this message]
2005-03-03 15:48 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-03-03 16:03 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-03 16:49 ` jmerkey
2005-03-03 17:39 ` James Simmons
2005-03-03 17:55 ` jmerkey
2005-03-03 20:11 ` Trever L. Adams
2005-03-03 20:31 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-03-04 11:05 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1109845583.28561.19.camel@tara.firmix.at \
--to=bernd@firmix.at \
--cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--cc=jmerkey@utah-nac.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®