From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262440AbVCIVXx (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:23:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262437AbVCIUcv (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:32:51 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:45957 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262373AbVCIULE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:11:04 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rwsem: Make rwsems use interrupt disabling spinlocks From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andrew Morton Cc: Badari Pulavarty , dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, suparna@in.ibm.com, linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <20050309114234.6598f486.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050309032832.159e58a4.akpm@osdl.org> <20050308170107.231a145c.akpm@osdl.org> <1110327267.24286.139.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <18744.1110364438@redhat.com> <20050309110404.GA4088@in.ibm.com> <1110366469.6280.84.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <4175.1110370343@redhat.com> <1110395783.24286.207.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <20050309114234.6598f486.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:10:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1110399036.6280.151.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.1 (++++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO 1.1 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Ingo, we already have a touch_nmi_watchdog() in the sysrq code. It might be > worth adding a touch_softlockup_watchdog() wherever we have a > touch_nmi_watchdog(). ....or add touch_softlockup_watchdog to touch_nmi_watchdog() instead and rename it tickle_watchdog() overtime.