From: Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: bunk@stusta.de, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/pnp/: possible cleanups
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:44:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1110588297.12485.251.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050311162320.15007aa3.akpm@osdl.org>
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 16:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch essential makes it impossible for PnP protocols to be
> > modules. Currently, they are all in-kernel. If that is acceptable...,
> > then this patch looks fine to me. Any comments?
>
> You're the maintainer...
I've been holding off on making many changes to PnP at the moment,
because I have been considering replacing it with a new (more modern and
ACPI capable) ISA/LPC bridge driver. This work would likely begin after
my PCI bridge driver rewrite is finished and merged (as the PCI work is
in some ways a prerequisite).
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111023821617705&w=2
Still, if there are changes to fix actual bugs, then I'm all for them.
Also a few features could be added. Specifically PnPBIOS
hotplug/docking station support. If anyone's interested, I may
implement it (and it would use some functions that were removed by this
patch). Furthermore, ISAPnP could be made a module. PnPBIOS probably
couldn't.
>
> If someone converts a protocol to be moduar, presumably they will re-add
> the needed exports to support that.
Correct.
>
> Are there likely to be any out-of-tree modular protocols in existence?
>
Not that I'm aware of.
So in short, I'd rather not remove them, because they take away from the
original design of the PnP layer.
Thanks,
Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-12 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-11 18:16 Adrian Bunk
2005-03-12 0:02 ` Adam Belay
2005-03-12 0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-12 0:44 ` Adam Belay [this message]
2005-03-12 0:46 ` Adam Belay
2005-03-12 17:07 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-17 0:08 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-17 0:35 ` Adam Belay
2005-05-02 1:46 Adrian Bunk
2005-02-27 0:52 Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1110588297.12485.251.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=abelay@novell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome