mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: bunk@stusta.de, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/pnp/: possible cleanups
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:44:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1110588297.12485.251.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050311162320.15007aa3.akpm@osdl.org>

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 16:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch essential makes it impossible for PnP protocols to be
> > modules.  Currently, they are all in-kernel.  If that is acceptable...,
> > then this patch looks fine to me.  Any comments?
> 
> You're the maintainer...

I've been holding off on making many changes to PnP at the moment,
because I have been considering replacing it with a new (more modern and
ACPI capable) ISA/LPC bridge driver.  This work would likely begin after
my PCI bridge driver rewrite is finished and merged (as the PCI work is
in some ways a prerequisite).

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111023821617705&w=2

Still, if there are changes to fix actual bugs, then I'm all for them.

Also a few features could be added.  Specifically PnPBIOS
hotplug/docking station support.  If anyone's interested, I may
implement it (and it would use some functions that were removed by this
patch).  Furthermore, ISAPnP could be made a module.  PnPBIOS probably
couldn't.

> 
> If someone converts a protocol to be moduar, presumably they will re-add
> the needed exports to support that.

Correct.

> 
> Are there likely to be any out-of-tree modular protocols in existence?
> 

Not that I'm aware of.

So in short, I'd rather not remove them, because they take away from the
original design of the PnP layer.

Thanks,
Adam



  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-12  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-11 18:16 Adrian Bunk
2005-03-12  0:02 ` Adam Belay
2005-03-12  0:23   ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-12  0:44     ` Adam Belay [this message]
2005-03-12  0:46       ` Adam Belay
2005-03-12 17:07       ` Adrian Bunk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-17  0:08 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-17  0:35 ` Adam Belay
2005-05-02  1:46 Adrian Bunk
2005-02-27  0:52 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1110588297.12485.251.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=abelay@novell.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome