From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261818AbVCLAtt (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:49:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261823AbVCLAtt (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:49:49 -0500 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([130.57.169.10]:11193 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261818AbVCLAto (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:49:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/pnp/: possible cleanups From: Adam Belay To: Andrew Morton Cc: bunk@stusta.de, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1110588297.12485.251.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050311181606.GC3723@stusta.de> <1110585763.12485.223.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050311162320.15007aa3.akpm@osdl.org> <1110588297.12485.251.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:46:57 -0500 Message-Id: <1110588417.12485.253.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So in short, I'd rather not remove them, because they take away from the > original design of the PnP layer. s/they/it would