From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262126AbVCPALT (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:11:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262187AbVCPAKX (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:10:23 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:26027 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262179AbVCPAHA (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:07:00 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_PM for ppc64, to allow sysrq o From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Olaf Hering Cc: Linux Kernel list , linuxppc64-dev In-Reply-To: <20050315212656.GA24563@suse.de> References: <20050315212656.GA24563@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:04:44 +1100 Message-Id: <1110931484.25201.60.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 22:26 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > For some weird reason, sysrq o is hidden behind CONFIG_PM. > Why? One can power off just fine without that. Can pm_sysrq_init be > moved to a better place? I think it used to be in sysrq.c in 2.4. > > Too bad, with this patch radeonfb fails to compile. Hehe :) ppc64 isn't yet ready for CONFIG_PM, though I have some hacks-in-progress ... Ben.