mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.11-mm4
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:39:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1111012757l.17756l.0l@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050316132600.3f6e4df2.akpm@osdl.org> (from akpm@osdl.org on Wed Mar 16 22:26:00 2005)


On 03.16, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> wrote:
> >
> > On 03.16, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >  > 
> >  > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11/2.6.11-mm4/
> >  > 
> >  ...
> >  >
> >  > +revert-gconfig-changes.patch
> >  > 
> >  >  Back out a recent change which broke gconfig.
> >  > 
> > 
> >  What was broken ?
> 
> hm.  I emailed you twice, and had a feeling that things weren't getting
> through.
> 
> The patch caused those little pixmap buttons across the top of the main
> window to vanish when using gtk+-1.2.10-28.1.  See
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/x.jpg.
> 
> I now note that scripts/kconfig/gconf.c doesn't compile at all with the
> above backout patch.  Drat.
> 

But gconf is not supposed to build with gtk-1.2, it needs 2.x,
at least reding this:

 linux/scripts/kconfig/Makefile:

HOSTLOADLIBES_gconf = `pkg-config gtk+-2.0 gmodule-2.0 libglade-2.0 --libs`
HOSTCFLAGS_gconf.o  = `pkg-config gtk+-2.0 gmodule-2.0 libglade-2.0 --cflags` \
                          -D LKC_DIRECT_LINK

...
# GTK needs some extra effort, too...
$(obj)/.tmp_gtkcheck:
    @if `pkg-config gtk+-2.0 gmodule-2.0 libglade-2.0 --exists`; then       \
        if `pkg-config gtk+-2.0 --atleast-version=2.0.0`; then          \
            touch $@;                               \
        else                                    \
            echo "*";                           \
            echo "* GTK+ is present but version >= 2.0.0 is required."; \
            echo "*";                           \
            false;                              \
        fi                                  \
    else                                        \
        echo "*";                               \
        echo "* Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that";   \
        echo "* the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed...";    \
        echo "* You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and libglade-2.0.";         \
        echo "*";                               \
        false;                                  \
    fi
endif

I can try just to make it compile, and then polish all the edges...
If you swear to me it does not have to build under gtk-1.2 (which with
current Makefile I do not know how can it be done), there are many stock
things that can be done automagically in 2.x, and not manually like in gtk-1.2.

TIA

--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es>     \               Software is like sex:
werewolf!able!es                         \         It's better when it's free
Mandrakelinux release 10.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.6.11-jam5 (gcc 3.4.3 (Mandrakelinux 10.2 3.4.3-6mdk)) #1



  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-16 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-16 12:06 2.6.11-mm4 Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 14:22 ` 2.6.11-mm4 Benoit Boissinot
2005-03-16 17:31   ` 2.6.11-mm4 Adrian Bunk
2005-03-16 14:33 ` 2.6.11-mm4 Brice Goglin
2005-03-16 15:07 ` 2.6.11-mm4 J.A. Magallon
2005-03-16 18:22   ` 2.6.11-mm4 Sam Ravnborg
2005-03-16 18:33     ` 2.6.11-mm4 Sam Ravnborg
2005-03-16 21:26   ` 2.6.11-mm4 Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 22:39     ` J.A. Magallon [this message]
2005-03-16 23:03       ` 2.6.11-mm4 Andrew Morton
2005-03-17 21:47       ` 2.6.11-mm4 Sam Ravnborg
2005-03-16 22:57     ` [PATCH] make gconfig build again J.A. Magallon
2005-03-16 23:09       ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 16:15 ` 2.6.11-mm4 maximilian attems
2005-03-16 22:50 ` 2.6.11-mm4 Sean Neakums
2005-03-16 23:06   ` 2.6.11-mm4 Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 23:22     ` 2.6.11-mm4 Sean Neakums
2005-03-17  8:19 ` 2.6.11-mm4 Paul Mundt
2005-03-17  8:42 ` 2.6.11-mm4 Borislav Petkov
2005-03-17  9:18   ` 2.6.11-mm4 Andrew Morton
2005-03-17  9:42     ` 2.6.11-mm4 Borislav Petkov
2005-03-17 11:07       ` 2.6.11-mm4 Borislav Petkov
2005-03-17 13:41         ` 2.6.11-mm4 Barry K. Nathan
2005-03-17 14:07           ` 2.6.11-mm4 Borislav Petkov
2005-03-23  9:42     ` 2.6.11-mm4 and 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 Borislav Petkov
2005-03-23 10:17       ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-24  7:09         ` Borislav Petkov
2005-03-19 13:39 ` 2.6.11-mm4: drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.c: enormous stack usage Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1111012757l.17756l.0l@werewolf.able.es \
    --to=jamagallon@able.es \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®