From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261292AbVCRACh (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:02:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261395AbVCRACg (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:02:36 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([213.162.118.85]:16816 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261292AbVCRACa (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:02:30 -0500 From: Matthew Garrett To: Nate Lawson Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4239E9BA.7050105@root.org> References: <1110741241.8136.46.camel@tyrosine> <423518E7.3030300@root.org> <1111072221.8136.171.camel@tyrosine> <4239E9BA.7050105@root.org> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:02:34 +0000 Message-Id: <1111104154.8136.179.camel@tyrosine> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 213.162.118.93 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org Subject: Re: [ACPI] IDE failure on ACPI resume Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cavan.codon.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 12:34 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > Very interesting. I was hoping to someday have _GTF et al implemented > but the ATA knowledge required was above my head. I also strongly > suspected that the info published by _GTF would likely be invalid. Does > Windows actually use that method or just hardcoded ATA initialization? I believe that Windows does use the _GTF methods. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org