From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261798AbVDEQfT (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:35:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261804AbVDEQfT (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:35:19 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:46823 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261798AbVDEQfM (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:35:12 -0400 Subject: RE: /proc on 2.4.21 & 2.6 kernels.... From: Arjan van de Ven To: Amanulla G Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdp@india.hp.com In-Reply-To: <200504051632.WAA05569@harvest.india.hp.com> References: <200504051632.WAA05569@harvest.india.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 18:35:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1112718903.6275.75.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.7 (+++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (3.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.1 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 21:52 +0530, Amanulla G wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for the mail. > May be I didn't put my question correctly. > On 2.4.21 based kernels /proc has got hidden directories which has got the > thread related statistics. I understood your question. However 2.4.21 kernels from kernel.org do not have such hidden directories. > My second part of question was: > On 2.6 kernels, we have /proc//task/xxx > My question is /proc/ stats reflect resource utilization of the > threads it has created? yes afaik it's cumulative over the threads there.