From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdietrich@mvista.com,
inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Priority Lists for the RT mutex
Date: 08 Apr 2005 10:11:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1112980281.22429.9.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050408062811.GA19204@elte.hu>
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 23:28, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> this one looks really clean.
>
> it makes me wonder, what is the current status of fusyn's? Such a light
> datastructure would be much more mergeable upstream than the former
> 100-queues approach.
Inaky was telling me that 100 queues approach is two years old.
The biggest problem is that fusyn has it's own PI system .. So it's not
clear if that will work with the RT mutex,. I was thinking the PI stuff
could be made generic so, fusyn, maybe futex, can use it also .
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-08 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-07 17:52 Daniel Walker
2005-04-08 6:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-08 8:05 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-04-10 11:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-12 17:56 ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-08 17:11 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2005-04-10 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-11 16:19 ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-12 18:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-04-08 21:25 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2005-04-08 22:53 ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-08 23:05 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2005-04-11 8:27 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2005-04-11 8:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-11 8:49 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2005-04-11 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-11 22:17 ` Bill Huey
2005-04-12 20:35 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-04-11 9:03 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2005-04-11 22:31 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2005-04-11 23:11 ` Bill Huey
2005-04-11 23:28 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2005-04-12 0:27 ` Bill Huey
2005-04-12 0:36 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2005-05-06 9:05 Oleg Nesterov
2005-05-06 11:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-05-06 18:56 ` Daniel Walker
2005-05-06 18:13 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2005-05-07 7:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-05-09 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-09 8:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-05-09 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-09 14:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-05-09 18:13 ` Daniel Walker
2005-05-09 19:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-05-09 21:29 ` Daniel Walker
2005-05-09 22:15 ` Daniel Walker
2005-05-09 14:07 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1112980281.22429.9.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com \
--to=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
--cc=simlo@phys.au.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®