From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Claudio Martins <ctpm@rnl.ist.utl.pt>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Processes stuck on D state on Dual Opteron
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:19:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1113268760.5090.13.camel@npiggin-nld.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504120122.48168.ctpm@rnl.ist.utl.pt>
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 01:22 +0100, Claudio Martins wrote:
> On Monday 11 April 2005 23:59, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> > > OK, I'll try them in a few minutes and report back.
> >
> > I'm not overly hopeful. If they fix the problem, then it's likely
> > that the real bug is hidden.
> >
>
> Well, the thing is, they do fix the problem. Or at least they hide it very
> well ;-)
>
> It has been running for more than 5 hours now with stress with no problems
> and no stuck processes.
>
Well, that is good... I guess ;)
Actually the patches I have sent you do fix real bugs, but they also
make the block layer less likely to recurse into page reclaim, so it
may be eg. hiding the problem that Neil's patch fixes.
It may be that your fundamental problem is solved by my patches, but
we need to be sure.
> I think I'm going to give a try to Neil's patch, but I'll have to apply some
> patches from -mm.
>
Yep that would be good. Please test -rc2 with Andrew's patch, and
obviously my patches backed out. Thanks for sticking with it.
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-12 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 2:16 Claudio Martins
2005-04-05 2:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-10 2:28 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-10 2:47 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-10 3:19 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-11 0:38 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-11 6:36 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 9:55 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 12:45 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 14:05 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-11 22:59 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 0:22 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-12 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-13 0:31 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-13 2:24 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 1:19 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-04-12 7:07 ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-12 8:03 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-12 11:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 11:26 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:04 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 17:07 ` Thomas Davis
2005-04-12 18:33 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-13 1:45 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 23:46 ` Neil Brown
2005-04-12 0:30 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-10 2:53 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-10 3:22 ` Claudio Martins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1113268760.5090.13.camel@npiggin-nld.site \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ctpm@rnl.ist.utl.pt \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®