From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261329AbVFAWEe (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:04:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261177AbVFAWEP (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:04:15 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:11973 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261319AbVFAWDB (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:03:01 -0400 Subject: Re: Freezer Patches. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Pavel Machek Cc: Nigel Cunningham , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050601130205.GA1940@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <1117629212.10328.26.camel@localhost> <20050601130205.GA1940@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:02:36 +1000 Message-Id: <1117663357.19020.70.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 15:02 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Here are the freezer patches. They were prepared against rc3, but I > > think they still apply fine against rc5. (Ben, these are the same ones I > > sent you the other day). > 300: stopping softirqd seems dangerous to me... are you sure? That sounds bogus indeed.