From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261966AbVFGU7T (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:59:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261972AbVFGU7T (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:59:19 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:10636 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261966AbVFGU7P (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:59:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly" From: Arjan van de Ven To: christoph Cc: Christoph Hellwig , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20050607194123.GA16637@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 22:59:09 +0200 Message-Id: <1118177949.5497.44.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.7 (+++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (3.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.1 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 12:59 -0700, christoph wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:30:03AM -0700, christoph wrote: > > > Move syscall table, timer_hpet and the boot_cpu_data into the "mostly_readonly" section. > > > > the syscall table should be completely readonly. > > Why was it in .data in the first place? There must be some reason why it > was writable? probably a historic oversight.