From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262034AbVFGXZK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:25:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262035AbVFGXZK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:25:10 -0400 Received: from 213-239-205-147.clients.your-server.de ([213.239.205.147]:18838 "EHLO mail.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262034AbVFGXZF (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:25:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [Trivial PATCH] new timeofday: move time sources into arch subdirectories From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: john stultz Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <1118185935.5191.6.camel@leatherman> References: <1118181331.20785.547.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <1118185935.5191.6.camel@leatherman> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: linutronix Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 01:25:51 +0200 Message-Id: <1118186751.20785.549.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 16:12 -0700, john stultz wrote: > Hey! Thanks for the feedback! I'm trying to encourage architectures to > share timesource drivers, so for now I'm not so worried if we end up > with something that looks like drivers/net/. It will :) > So unless you strenuously object, I say lets put it off until the need > becomes a bit more apparent. Although its likely I'll agree with you > once I've started working on converting ARM. :) I looked at ARM particular and it has about 20+ implementations. tglx