From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261859AbVFLARY (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:17:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261860AbVFLARY (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:17:24 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:18939 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261859AbVFLARW (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:17:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich To: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Daniel Walker , Esben Nielsen , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1118534842.13312.111.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> References: <1118510817.13312.88.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <1118515236.9519.92.camel@sdietrich-xp.vilm.net> <1118534842.13312.111.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:15:59 -0700 Message-Id: <1118535360.5593.180.camel@sdietrich-xp.vilm.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 02:07 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > This is too complex to argue about here. > > Whats too complex? Are you asserting that other people e.g. me, are too > dumb to understand that ? > No, I said HERE, not FOR YOU.