From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261860AbVFLAVN@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261860AbVFLAVN (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:21:13 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261861AbVFLAVN
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:21:13 -0400
Received: from 213-239-205-147.clients.your-server.de ([213.239.205.147]:19896
	"EHLO mail.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261860AbVFLAVM
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:21:12 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de
To: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@mvista.com>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>, Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <1118535360.5593.180.camel@sdietrich-xp.vilm.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10506110930050.27294-100000@godzilla.mvista.com>
	 <1118510817.13312.88.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de>
	 <1118515236.9519.92.camel@sdietrich-xp.vilm.net>
	 <1118534842.13312.111.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de>
	 <1118535360.5593.180.camel@sdietrich-xp.vilm.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: linutronix
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 02:22:16 +0200
Message-Id: <1118535737.13312.120.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 17:15 -0700, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 02:07 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > 
> > > This is too complex to argue about here.
> > 
> > Whats too complex? Are you asserting that other people e.g. me, are too
> > dumb to understand that ?
> > 
> 
> No, I said HERE, not FOR YOU. 

So where do you suggest to discuss this ?

tglx