From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262221AbVFSJ3g@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262221AbVFSJ3g (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:29:36 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262223AbVFSJ3g
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:29:36 -0400
Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:9286 "EHLO
	mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S262221AbVFSJ3d (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:29:33 -0400
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.12
From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
To: randy_dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>, aquynh@gmail.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20050618193636.70ab8b05.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
References: <200506182005.28254.nick@linicks.net>
	 <9a8748490506181233675f2fd5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9cde8bff0506181839d41aab3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506181847550.11617@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
	 <20050618193636.70ab8b05.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NprnitjdSw9fk0/IfpGT"
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:29:29 +0100
Message-Id: <1119173369.9557.59.camel@azathoth.hellion.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--=-NprnitjdSw9fk0/IfpGT
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 19:36 -0700, randy_dunlap wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:48:59 -0700 (PDT) David Lang wrote:
>=20
> | On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, aq wrote:
> |=20
> | > the version number is a little bit confused here: if I want to upgrad=
e
> | > from for example 2.6.11.5 to 2.6.12, which patch should I get?
> |=20
> | you reverse the 2.6.11 -> 2.6.11.5 patch to get back to a vinilla 2.6.1=
1
> | then you apply the 2.6.11->2.6.12 patch.
>=20
> Hrm, I expected ketchup to be able to handle that already.
> Does it not?

It worked for me.

Ian.

--=20
Ian Campbell

We is confronted with insurmountable opportunities.
		-- Walt Kelly, "Pogo"

--=-NprnitjdSw9fk0/IfpGT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCtTr5M0+0qS9rzVkRAmU1AKDKv0rUW0bllfaXch+O0BYocYYJ2ACglvXF
nA2vRzoT18hH7GHYlU62IUg=
=vSns
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-NprnitjdSw9fk0/IfpGT--