From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263239AbVFXKrv (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:47:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263242AbVFXKrv (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:47:51 -0400 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:30903 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263239AbVFXKpr (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:45:47 -0400 Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins From: Alan Cox To: Hans Reiser Cc: David Masover , Horst von Brand , Jeff Garzik , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ReiserFS List In-Reply-To: <42BB5E1A.70903@namesys.com> References: <200506231924.j5NJOvLA031008@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <42BB31E9.50805@slaphack.com> <1119570225.18655.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42BB5E1A.70903@namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1119609680.17066.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:41:21 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Gwe, 2005-06-24 at 02:12, Hans Reiser wrote: > >In which case the features belong in the VFS as all those with > >experience and kernel contributions have been arguing. > So you fundamentally reject the prototype it in one fs and then abstract > it to others development model? More fundamentally - prototype things *out* of the main kernel. If everyone was doing their prototyping in kernel Andrew Morton would by now be a team of about 25 Alan