From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261493AbVFZSEw (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:04:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261527AbVFZSEw (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:04:52 -0400 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:59078 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261493AbVFZSEv (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:04:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Promise ATA/133 Errors With 2.6.10+ From: Alan Cox To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Erik Slagter , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <1119688191.4293.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1119808784.28649.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:59:46 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sad, 2005-06-25 at 09:35, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > BTW2 could it be that somewhere a timeout has been lowered in recent > > kernels? That must have been pre-2.6.11 then. Timeouts have not changed or have increased in fact.