From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261937AbVF0I2Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:28:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261943AbVF0I2Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:28:25 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:9106 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261937AbVF0I2R (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:28:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] SPI core -- revisited From: Arjan van de Ven To: Vitaly Wool Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <42BF7496.7080204@dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <20050626193621.8B8E44C4D1@abc.pervushin.pp.ru> <200506270049.10970.adobriyan@gmail.com> <1119819580.3215.47.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <42BF7496.7080204@dev.rtsoft.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:28:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1119860886.3186.30.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.7 (+++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (3.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.1 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 07:37 +0400, Vitaly Wool wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > > > ... or just kill the wrappers entirely! > > > > > > > Nothing's gonna work in DMA case if he kills the wrappers. how is that??