From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261420AbVF0KMP (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:12:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261417AbVF0KMP (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:12:15 -0400 Received: from oldconomy.demon.nl ([212.238.217.56]:55241 "EHLO artemis.slagter.name") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261431AbVF0KMG (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:12:06 -0400 Subject: Re: Promise ATA/133 Errors With 2.6.10+ From: Erik Slagter To: Alan Cox Cc: Justin Piszcz , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1119808784.28649.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1119688191.4293.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1119808784.28649.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:11:36 +0200 Message-Id: <1119867096.4020.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-8) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 18:59 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sad, 2005-06-25 at 09:35, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > > BTW2 could it be that somewhere a timeout has been lowered in recent > > > kernels? That must have been pre-2.6.11 then. > > Timeouts have not changed or have increased in fact. Never mind, the offending harddisk has ceased to be yesterday, it is no more. What really bothers me, though, is that until the very last moment it was alive, it didn't report any smart error, nor did any self test fail. I guess IBM is to blame here :-(