From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262845AbVGAWKY (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:10:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261609AbVGAWJE (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:09:04 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:16890 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262845AbVGAWGk (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:06:40 -0400 Subject: Re: Question about patch order From: Daniel Walker Reply-To: dwalker@mvista.com To: george@mvista.com Cc: lkml In-Reply-To: <42C59EDD.2080206@mvista.com> References: <42C59EDD.2080206@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: MontaVista Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:06:32 -0700 Message-Id: <1120255592.15610.10.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 12:51 -0700, George Anzinger wrote: > Suppose I am doing this prior to my morning coffee, but... > > What should the -rc patch(s) be applied to? Should it be > 2.6.x or 2.6.x.n > e.g. the 2.6.12 kernel or the 2.6.12.2 kernel? > > If the former, does the -rc contain the .n stuff? 2.6.x Daniel