From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261631AbVGKLIW (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:08:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261633AbVGKLIW (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:08:22 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:1701 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261631AbVGKLIN (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:08:13 -0400 Subject: Re: PROBLEM: fork() & setpriority() From: Arjan van de Ven To: Rommer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <42D250C1.6070604@active.by> References: <42D250C1.6070604@active.by> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:07:55 +0200 Message-Id: <1121080075.3177.16.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 2.8 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 13:58 +0300, Rommer wrote: > Hello, > > I have trouble with fork() and setpriority(). > When priority of child process != priority of parent process > and used SIGCHLD handler. > See example. the example is buggy in that printf() isn't allowed in signal handlers btw...