mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor()
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 15:28:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11222156.oKTjYXFZjG@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80c4bd8c577e5da0aa63342671773be5cdc26a9a.1378012620.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On Sunday, September 01, 2013 10:56:02 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We can't take a big lock around __cpufreq_governor() as this causes recursive
> locking for some cases. But calls to this routine must be serialized for every
> policy.

Care to explain here why it must be serialized?

> Lets introduce another variable which would guarantee serialization here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 ++++++-
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index f320a20..4d5723db 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1692,13 +1692,15 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  						policy->cpu, event);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
> -	if ((policy->governor_enabled && (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) ||
> +	if (policy->governor_busy ||
> +		(policy->governor_enabled && (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) ||

Again, broken white space, but I can fix it up.

>  		(!policy->governor_enabled && ((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS) ||
>  					       (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)))) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
> +	policy->governor_busy = true;
>  	if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)
>  		policy->governor_enabled = false;
>  	else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
> @@ -1727,6 +1729,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  			((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT) && !ret))
>  		module_put(policy->governor->owner);
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
> +	policy->governor_busy = false;
> +	mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index d568f39..cca885d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
>  	struct cpufreq_governor	*governor; /* see below */
>  	void			*governor_data;
>  	bool			governor_enabled; /* governor start/stop flag */
> +	bool			governor_busy;
>  
>  	struct work_struct	update; /* if update_policy() needs to be
>  					 * called, but you're in IRQ context */
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-01 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-01  5:26 [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: don't allow governor limits to be changed when it is disabled Viresh Kumar
2013-09-01  5:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
2013-09-01 13:28   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-09-01 16:00     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-01 20:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-02  1:00         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-02 12:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-03 13:20   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-03 19:40     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-13 11:44       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-13 23:48         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-14  4:29           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-17 11:49         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-04 23:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-04 23:50       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-09-05  0:26         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-05  0:54           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-09-06  6:03             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-06 12:31               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10  6:52     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10  8:47       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-01  6:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: don't allow governor limits to be changed when it is disabled Viresh Kumar
2013-09-01 13:29   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-01 13:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11222156.oKTjYXFZjG@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®