From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261962AbVGZVN1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:13:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262060AbVGZVI2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:08:28 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:10217 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262058AbVGZVGD (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:06:03 -0400 Subject: Re: Memory pressure handling with iSCSI From: Badari Pulavarty To: Rik van Riel Cc: lkml , linux-mm , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: References: <1122399331.6433.29.camel@dyn9047017102.beaverton.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:05:49 -0700 Message-Id: <1122411949.6433.50.camel@dyn9047017102.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:59 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > After KS & OLS discussions about memory pressure, I wanted to re-do > > iSCSI testing with "dd"s to see if we are throttling writes. > > Could you also try with shared writable mmap, to see if that > works ok or triggers a deadlock ? I can, but lets finish addressing one issue at a time. Last time, I changed too many things at the same time and got no where :( Thanks, Badari