From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261483AbVG1B1z (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:27:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261484AbVG1B1q (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:27:46 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]:51702 "EHLO ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261483AbVG1B0m (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:26:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable From: Steven Rostedt To: Lee Revell Cc: Daniel Walker , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <1122513645.22844.15.camel@mindpipe> References: <1122473595.29823.60.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1122512420.5014.6.camel@c-67-188-6-232.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1122513645.22844.15.camel@mindpipe> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Kihon Technologies Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:26:20 -0400 Message-Id: <1122513980.29823.152.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 21:20 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 18:00 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > Don't you break sched_find_first_bit() , seems it's dependent on a > > 140-bit bitmap . > > And doesn't POSIX specify 100 RT priority levels? My customers don't care about POSIX :-) -- Steve