From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261392AbVG1JGN (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:06:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261386AbVG1JGN (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:06:13 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:47326 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261389AbVG1JGJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:06:09 -0400 Subject: Re: ppc: Sungem auto-negotiation problem From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Ajay Patel Cc: linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <90f56e4805072711341bc156d9@mail.gmail.com> References: <90f56e4805072711341bc156d9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:03:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1122541399.18835.21.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 11:34 -0700, Ajay Patel wrote: > Hi, > > I have a PowerMac G5. (Newer Model with SMU). > It has a Sungem ethernet with "PHY ID: 2060d2". > > When this ethernet is connected to > "Tigon3 [partno(BCM95704A6) rev 2002 PHY(5704)] " or > to the cisco switch, The PowerMac declares link up with > 100 Mbs, while the other end declares link up with 1000Mbs. > In this setup both end cannot ping each other. > > If I lower the speed of Tigon based adapter or Cisco's switch > port to 100Mbs, both end can ping each other. > > Is it a bug? or Am I missing something? I posted a patch that might fix it a while ago. What kernel version have you tested specifically ? Ben.