mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pmarques@grupopie.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: use kcalloc instead kmalloc/memset
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 16:09:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1123333780.11074.15.camel@haji.ri.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508060151330.3728@scrub.home>

On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 02:40 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> I actually looked at the current kcalloc users and besides a few unchecked 
> module parameters, the arguments were either constant or had to be checked 
> anyway. I didn't find a single example which required the "safety" of 
> kcalloc().

Every caller of kcalloc() should do proper bounds checking. It's just
that when they forget to do it, we hopefully avoid a buffer overflow
which can be exploited.

			Pekka


  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-06 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-05  5:29 Pekka Enberg
2005-08-05  5:38 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-05  6:30   ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-08-05  6:36     ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-05  6:52       ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-08-06 15:09         ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-08 10:11           ` Takashi Iwai
2005-08-08 21:05             ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-09 10:09               ` Takashi Iwai
2005-08-05  9:37       ` Roman Zippel
2005-08-05  9:46         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-08-05  9:59           ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-08-05 10:07           ` [PATCH] " Roman Zippel
2005-08-05 10:13             ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-08-05 10:32               ` Roman Zippel
2005-08-05 10:38                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-08-05 10:56                   ` Roman Zippel
2005-08-05 11:12                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-08-06  0:40                       ` Roman Zippel
2005-08-06 13:09                         ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2005-08-08  6:25                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-08-05 17:49                 ` Stephen Pollei
2005-08-05 18:16                   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-05 18:39                     ` Stephen Pollei
2005-08-05 10:15             ` Pekka J Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1123333780.11074.15.camel@haji.ri.fi \
    --to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome