From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964917AbVHIVsh (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:48:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964916AbVHIVsh (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:48:37 -0400 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:21963 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964914AbVHIVsg (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:48:36 -0400 Subject: Re: irqpoll causing some breakage? From: Alan Cox To: Daniel Drake Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mog.johnny@gmx.net In-Reply-To: <42F8E3E3.1010201@gentoo.org> References: <42F7FD5E.6000107@gentoo.org> <1123605419.15600.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42F8E3E3.1010201@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:14:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1123625697.19543.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2005-08-09 at 18:12 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > Without the parameters it has exactly zero effect on the operation of > > the kernel, the algorithms and the behaviour. So something odd is afoot > > if its causing gentoo breakages. > > Thats what I thought, yet it seems to be the difference between mouse and no > mouse in this case. > > Strange. We'll try a different compiler. What do the other reports look like ?