From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965195AbVHPKZ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:25:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965196AbVHPKZ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:25:59 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:44180 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965195AbVHPKZ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:25:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll() From: Arjan van de Ven To: Hiro Yoshioka Cc: taka@valinux.co.jp, lkml.hyoshiok@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050816.191617.1025215458.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com> References: <20050816.131729.15816429.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20050816.135425.719901536.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com> <1124171015.3215.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050816.191617.1025215458.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:25:50 +0200 Message-Id: <1124187950.3215.31.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 2.8 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 19:16 +0900, Hiro Yoshioka wrote: > From: Arjan van de Ven > > > My code does nothing do it. > > > > > > I need a volunteer to implement it. > > > > it's actually not too hard; all you need is to use SSE and not MMX; and > > then just store sse register you're overwriting on the stack or so... > > oh, really? Does the linux kernel take care of > SSE save/restore on a task switch? not on kernel entry afaik. However just save the register on the stack and put it back at the end...