From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932291AbVHRRWD (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:22:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932317AbVHRRWD (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:22:03 -0400 Received: from [81.2.110.250] ([81.2.110.250]:8834 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932291AbVHRRWB (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:22:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6 1/2] New Syscall: get rlimits of any process (update) From: Alan Cox To: e8607062@student.tuwien.ac.at Cc: linux-kernel , Elliot Lee In-Reply-To: <1124381951.6251.14.camel@w2> References: <1124326652.8359.3.camel@w2> <1124381951.6251.14.camel@w2> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:49:01 +0100 Message-Id: <1124387342.16072.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Also some documention for specific services show that there is a need to > adjust rlimits per process at runtime, e.g.: > http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-11.html#ss11.4 > http://slacksite.com/apache/logging.html > http://staff.in2.hr/denis/oracle/10g1install_fedora3_en.html#n2 Perhaps those application authors should provide a management interface to do so within the soft limit range at least. Its not clear to me that growing the fd array on a process is even safe. Some programs do size arrays at startup after querying the rlimit data.