From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932359AbVHVXKT (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:10:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932341AbVHVXKT (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:10:19 -0400 Received: from zeus1.kernel.org ([204.152.191.4]:56464 "EHLO zeus1.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932359AbVHVXKQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:10:16 -0400 Subject: Re: New maintainer needed for the Linux smb filesystem From: Steven Rostedt To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk In-Reply-To: References: <20050821143457.GA5726@stusta.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Kihon Technologies Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:48:36 -0400 Message-Id: <1124671716.5208.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 22:26 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Adrian Bunk writes: > > > Since Urban Widmark was not active for some time, and I didn't have any > > success trying to reach him, it seems we need a new maintainer for the > > smb filesystem in the Linux kernel. > > > > Is there anyone who both feels qualified and wants to become the new > > maintainer? > > One way would be to just deprecate and later drop it and let people > use cifs instead which is maintained. It only doesn't work with > some extremly old smb servers which are probably not very numerous > anymore. Or you could deprecate it and later drop it and when people complain, you just found your new maintainer :-) -- Steve