From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750829AbVH3Jyy (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:54:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750830AbVH3Jyy (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:54:54 -0400 Received: from ns.firmix.at ([62.141.48.66]:34002 "EHLO ns.firmix.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750829AbVH3Jyx (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:54:53 -0400 Subject: Re: KLive: Linux Kernel Live Usage Monitor From: Bernd Petrovitsch To: Rogier Wolff Cc: Sven Ladegast , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050830094058.GA29214@bitwizard.nl> References: <20050830030959.GC8515@g5.random> <20050830082901.GA25438@bitwizard.nl> <20050830094058.GA29214@bitwizard.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Firmix Software GmbH Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:54:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1125395682.4882.53.camel@tara.firmix.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 11:40 +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: [...] > would IMHO work better. (A userspace program is technically a better > solution, the social aspect of getting a bigger user-base is the main > reason for me to suggest the in-kernel approach). So *if* a user wants to participate, he/she also installs and configures some daemon for this (which is also easier to look into if one is curious) and there is no "Linux kernel phones home" stories. And if not, he/she can easily remove it (again). Bernd -- Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/ mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55 Embedded Linux Development and Services