From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751436AbVH3OBG (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:01:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751437AbVH3OBF (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:01:05 -0400 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:48363 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751436AbVH3OBE (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:01:04 -0400 Subject: Re: APs from the Kernel Summit run Linux From: Alan Cox To: Vojtech Pavlik Cc: Harald Welte , LKML In-Reply-To: <20050830131256.GA12381@midnight.suse.cz> References: <20050830085522.GA8820@midnight.suse.cz> <20050830101958.GJ4202@rama.de.gnumonks.org> <20050830121810.GA11582@midnight.suse.cz> <20050830125648.GG4295@rama.de.gnumonks.org> <20050830131256.GA12381@midnight.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:30:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1125412206.8276.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > According to http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/, it is either still RedHat > > or already transferred to the FSF. That doesn't sound like dual > > licensing, I don't think the FSF would do that... > > That was my thinking, too. eCos at least historically had other licensing options too.