From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932337AbVHaDJ5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:09:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932340AbVHaDJ5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:09:57 -0400 Received: from visp.inabox.net ([203.49.196.168]:64189 "EHLO ephemera.fooishbar.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932337AbVHaDJ5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:09:57 -0400 Subject: Re: State of Linux graphics From: Daniel Stone To: Discuss issues related to the xorg tree Cc: lkml , Xserver development In-Reply-To: <9e47339105083009037c24f6de@mail.gmail.com> References: <9e47339105083009037c24f6de@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:11:00 +1000 Message-Id: <1125457860.8730.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:03 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > The article has been reviewed but if it still contains technical > errors please let me know. Opinions on the content are also > appreciated. 'As a whole, the X.org community barely has enough resources to build a single server. Splitting these resources over many paths only results in piles of half finished projects. I know developers prefer working on whatever interests them, but given the resources available to X.org, this approach will not yield a new server or even a fully-competitive desktop based on the old server in the near term. Maybe it is time for X.org to work out a roadmap for all to follow.' You lose.