mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Bo Zhang <zhangbo0325@gmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org
Cc: surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, brendan.jackman@linux.dev,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com, ljs@kernel.org,
	liam@infradead.org, rppt@kernel.org, qi.zheng@linux.dev,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, kasong@tencent.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
	zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com, lipengfei28@xiaomi.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] mm: compaction: mTHP-friendly memory compaction
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:52:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11264869-00ad-44ea-b39c-a78347af0ee1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001001412.3837085-1-zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>

On 10/1/26 02:14, Bo Zhang wrote:
> Open questions:
> 
> 1. In skip_isolation_on_order() and elsewhere, the target order is read
>    from huge_anon_orders_always directly, since during proactive
>    compaction cc->order is -1 (via compact_memory) and there is no clean
>    way to plumb the mTHP order down.

Isn't using  struct compact_control clean enough? There's already many
fields like
    bool direct_compaction;         /* False from kcompactd or /proc/... */
    bool proactive_compaction;      /* kcompactd proactive compaction */

Who says is_via_compact_memory() cannot be refactored into something using
these kinds of fields and not 'order' being -1, which could be then used as
the target order.

> This variable can change under
>    userspace at any time, making the semantics fragile. Ideas on how to
>    pass the target order through the proactive path cleanly are welcome.
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-20 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01  0:14 Bo Zhang
2026-10-01  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] mm: compaction: parameterize fragmentation score by order Bo Zhang
2026-10-01  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] mm: compaction: target mTHP order for proactive compaction Bo Zhang
2026-10-19  8:12   ` Dev Jain
2026-10-19 14:50     ` Xueyuan Chen
2026-10-19 15:03     ` Bo Zhang
2026-10-20  6:48       ` Dev Jain
2026-10-19 15:47     ` Bo Zhang
2026-10-01  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] mm: compaction: skip isolating large folios that already satisfy mTHP Bo Zhang
2026-10-01  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] mm: compaction: skip unmovable blocks for non-costly proactive mTHP compaction Bo Zhang
2026-10-19  9:43   ` Dev Jain
2026-10-19 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] mm: compaction: mTHP-friendly memory compaction Xueyuan Chen
2026-10-20 14:52 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11264869-00ad-44ea-b39c-a78347af0ee1@kernel.org \
    --to=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhangbo0325@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®