From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: vatsa@in.ibm.com, Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix race in cpu_down (hotplug cpu)
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:22:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1127114538.5272.16.camel@npiggin-nld.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1127113930.4087.6.camel@linux-hp.sh.intel.com>
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 15:12 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 16:36 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Ah, actually I have a patch which makes all CPU idle threads
> > run with preempt disabled and only enable preempt when scheduling.
> > Would that help?
> It should solve the issue to me. Should we take care of the latency?
> acpi_processor_idle might execute for a long time.
>
Oh really? I think yes, the latency should be taken care of because
we want to be able to provide good latency even for !preempt kernels.
If a solution can be found for acpi_processor_idle, that would be
ideal.
IMO it always felt kind of hackish to run the idle threads with
preempt on.
Thanks,
Nick
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-19 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-19 4:48 Li, Shaohua
2005-09-19 5:10 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-19 5:31 ` Shaohua Li
2005-09-19 5:57 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-19 6:11 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-19 6:23 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-19 6:29 ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-19 7:00 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-19 6:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-19 7:09 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-19 6:37 ` Shaohua Li
2005-09-19 6:36 ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-19 6:54 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-19 7:12 ` Shaohua Li
2005-09-19 7:22 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-09-19 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-09-19 7:37 ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-19 22:55 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-20 4:41 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-19 7:07 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-19 5:23 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-19 5:28 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-19 5:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-19 7:43 ` Where do packets sent to 255.255.255.255 go? Wei-Che, Hsu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-19 3:28 PATCH: Fix race in cpu_down (hotplug cpu) Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-19 4:22 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-19 3:15 Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1127114538.5272.16.camel@npiggin-nld.site \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®