From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965130AbVJEMAk (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 08:00:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965128AbVJEMAk (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 08:00:40 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:35034 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965131AbVJEMAj (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 08:00:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keys: Export user-defined keyring operations From: Arjan van de Ven To: David Howells Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, Michael C Thompson , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <29094.1128512432@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> References: <1128510159.2920.15.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <28129.1128509939@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <29094.1128512432@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:00:29 +0200 Message-Id: <1128513630.2920.25.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 2.8 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 12:40 +0100, David Howells wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > since this is new unique-to-linux functionality, could you please > > consider making the exports _GPL please? > > I have. the patch doesn't show it though ;) are there any users of this? Is this accidentally for an external non-GPL module??? If so sounds like a bad idea.