From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932133AbVJTNLf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:11:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932131AbVJTNLf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:11:35 -0400 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:26024 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932133AbVJTNLf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:11:35 -0400 Subject: Re: Reduce idle connection timeout From: Alan Cox To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1rcio?= Oliveira Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <43553205.9010006@rhla.com> References: <43553205.9010006@rhla.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:40:01 +0100 Message-Id: <1129815601.15200.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2005-10-18 at 15:33 -0200, Márcio Oliveira wrote: > Hi, > > Anybody knows how can I reduce the idle connections (TCP, UDP, ...) > timeout in Linux systems? TCP timeout minimums are specified in the standard and we follow them anyway. UDP has no "connection".