From: Josh Boyer <jdub@us.ibm.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, jffs-dev@axis.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:10:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1130879436.3775.1.camel@windu.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051101205119.GY8009@stusta.de>
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:51 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Is there any reason for keeping fs/jffs2/ioctl.c?
I can think of some various things that could be done with it, but that
would require time and effort. Unless David or Thomas have an
objections, I think it can go.
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-01 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-01 20:51 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-01 21:10 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2005-11-02 9:47 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1130879436.3775.1.camel@windu.rchland.ibm.com \
--to=jdub@us.ibm.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jffs-dev@axis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®