From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965076AbVKBPc4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:32:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965085AbVKBPc4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:32:56 -0500 Received: from [81.2.110.250] ([81.2.110.250]:32147 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965076AbVKBPcz (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:32:55 -0500 Subject: Re: PATCH: EDAC - clean up atomic stuff From: Alan Cox To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dthompson@lnxi.com In-Reply-To: <20051102162653.4f0b8054.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1129902050.26367.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1130772628.9145.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051031120254.4579dc9a.akpm@osdl.org> <20051102162653.4f0b8054.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:02:45 +0000 Message-Id: <1130947366.2432.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mer, 2005-11-02 at 16:26 +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > Well if we retain KM_BOUNCE_READ then we'll need local_irq_save(). If > edac_mc_scrub_block() will alwyas be called from process context then we > can use KM_USER0 and leave interrupts enabled. > > Alan, can you confirm please? Probably best to local_irq_save. Especially considering the likely direction of updates once it is merged Alan