From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: rddunlap@osdl.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
macro@linux-mips.org, Jean-Christian de Rivaz <jc@eclis.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dean@arctic.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: NTP broken with 2.6.14
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:54:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1131058482.27168.612.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436A8ADB.2090307@eclis.ch>
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 23:10 +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> john stultz a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 22:12 +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >
> >>A have tested 7 differents vanilla kernel on the same suspect hardware:
> >>
> >> 2.6.8 : ntpd working : drift from -77ppm to -144ppm
> >> 2.6.9 : ntpd working : drift from -99ppm to -231ppm
> >> 2.6.10 : ntpd failed : drift from -37825ppm to -29912ppm
> >> 2.6.12 : ntpd failed : drift from -43429ppm to -45251ppm
> >
> >
> > Ok, that makes it pretty clear we have a regression w/ 2.6.10. I really
> > appreciate your helping narrow down this issue. If you have the time,
> > could you test the three 2.6.10-rcX patches?
> >
> > You can find them here:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/
> >
> > And they apply independently (not cumulatively) ontop of 2.6.9
>
> I will try, but compiling the kernels take time even with 3 machines
> (one per kernel version)...
>
>
> I compared the dmesg log of the different kernel, but since I don't know
> what I should find it's a little difficult. There is many differences
> between each kernels. Despit that, I noticed this difference between the
> kernel 2.6.9 (ntps working) and the kernel 2.6.10 (ntpd failed):
>
> --- linux-2.6.9.txt 2005-11-03 22:49:29.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.10.txt 2005-11-03 22:48:41.000000000 +0100
> [...snip...]
> @@ -67,16 +68,12 @@
> Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
> Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
> ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
> - vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=-1
> - 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
> - ...trying to set up timer (IRQ0) through the 8259A ... failed.
> - ...trying to set up timer as Virtual Wire IRQ... failed.
> - ...trying to set up timer as ExtINT IRQ... works.
> + vector=0x31 pin1=0 pin2=-1
> Registered protocol family 16
> PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfbbb0, last bus=3
> Using configuration type 1
> [..snip...]
>
> Maybe a way to go ?
You might check booting w/ noapic to see if that changes the behaviour
in 2.6.10.
I know there were some pretty troubling issues w/ the nforce2 early in
the 2.6 cycle. See
http://atlas.et.tudelft.nl/verwei90/nforce2/index.html for some details.
Maciej: I noticed you had been involved with earlier nforce2 issues.
Does the above change in the ioapic pin1 value look familiar?
Digging around in the bkcvs git web between 2.6.9 and 2.6.10, I found
the following ioapic related changes:
Randy:
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/old-2.6-bkcvs.git;a=commitdiff;h=0b517c442f66f9b1e280ca49d4b215cc3681d4e5;hp=60a7a584ad5a266afa5d7fde5f2828894e615c17
Len:
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/old-2.6-bkcvs.git;a=commitdiff;h=eb3f18413cb759662b34230674fb6f07c9e16e56;hp=e87e2e7669129dc0e8b2959c656650d7ea5c066f
Any clues?
Jean-Christian: Since it ACPI is involved, have you verified that you're
running the current BIOS for your system?
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-03 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-02 23:05 Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-02 23:21 ` john stultz
2005-11-02 23:37 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 0:15 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 0:45 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 1:07 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 2:26 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 19:32 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 19:51 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-03 20:11 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 20:48 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-03 21:00 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 21:12 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-03 21:28 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 21:12 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 21:41 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 22:10 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 22:54 ` john stultz [this message]
2005-11-04 0:15 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-04 0:40 ` john stultz
2005-11-04 2:50 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-06 22:49 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2005-11-07 21:44 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-04 12:40 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-11-02 23:24 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 0:36 ` Roman Zippel
2005-11-03 1:13 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 9:42 ` Roman Zippel
2005-11-04 3:44 Brown, Len
2005-11-04 4:07 ` john stultz
2005-11-04 13:51 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-04 16:39 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-04 17:41 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1131058482.27168.612.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dean@arctic.org \
--cc=jc@eclis.ch \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®