From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: recent NFS problems?
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:50:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1131205802.8754.9.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436C50FE.3030600@pobox.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1474 bytes --]
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 01:28 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> This is a bit weird. Running 2.6.14-g6037d6bb (libata-dev.git branch
> 'upstream') on both client and server. Its latest Linux
> (7015faa7df829876a0f931cd18aa6d7c24a1b581) plus one libata patch. All
> NFSv4 kernel options are enabled, on both client and server.
>
> On Host A, I mirror a local directory /garz/nsmail to an NFS directory
> Host_B:/g/g/nsmail via rsync+ssh. Host A also NFS mounts Host_B:/g
> locally. mount on Host A says
>
> host_b:/g on /g type nfs (rw,tcp,intr,posix,addr=10.10.10.1)
>
> Seeing some directory weirdness, where wildcard matches fail
> (NFS-related dcache bugs?) but direct accesses succeed:
>
> [jgarzik@host_a~]$ ssh host_b "ls -d /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/*11*"
> /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/Sent.20051105
> /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/Sent.20051105.msf
> /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/Sent.20051105.sbd
> /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/Trash.20051105
> /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/Trash.20051105.msf
> /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/Trash.20051105.sbd
>
> [jgarzik@host_a ~]$ ls -d /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/*11*
> ls: /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/*11*: No such file or directory
>
> [jgarzik@host_a ~]$ ls -l /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/Trash.20051105
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 jgarzik jgarzik 67484129 Nov 5 00:02
> /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/Trash.20051105
>
> [jgarzik@host_a~]$ wc -l /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/Trash.20051105
> 1739088 /g/g/nsmail/Trash.sbd/Trash.20051105
Hmm... Does reverting the attached patch help?
Cheers,
Trond
[-- Attachment #2: linux-2.6.14-77-remove_lookup_parent_reval.dif --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1508 bytes --]
Author: Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:48:36 -0400
NFS: nfs_lookup doesn't need to revalidate the parent directory's inode
nfs_lookup() used to consult a lookup cache before trying an actual wire
lookup operation. The lookup cache would be invalid, of course, if the
parent directory's mtime had changed, so nfs_lookup performed an inode
revalidation on the parent.
Since nfs_lookup() doesn't use a cache anymore, the revalidation is no
longer necessary. There are cases where it will generate a lot of
unnecessary GETATTR traffic.
See http://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Test-plan:
Use lndir and "rm -rf" and watch for excess GETATTR traffic or application
level errors.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
---
fs/nfs/dir.c | 6 ------
1 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/nfs/dir.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -853,12 +853,6 @@ static struct dentry *nfs_lookup(struct
dentry->d_op = NFS_PROTO(dir)->dentry_ops;
lock_kernel();
- /* Revalidate parent directory attribute cache */
- error = nfs_revalidate_inode(NFS_SERVER(dir), dir);
- if (error < 0) {
- res = ERR_PTR(error);
- goto out_unlock;
- }
/* If we're doing an exclusive create, optimize away the lookup */
if (nfs_is_exclusive_create(dir, nd))
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-05 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-05 6:28 Jeff Garzik
2005-11-05 15:50 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1131205802.8754.9.camel@lade.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®