mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-Kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/14] mm: pte prefetch
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:35:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1131266102.2826.3.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436DBCE2.4050502@yahoo.com.au>

On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 19:20 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 2/14
> 
> plain text document attachment (mm-pte-prefetch.patch)
> Prefetch ptes a line ahead. Worth 25% on ia64 when doing big forks.
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> @@ -196,6 +196,33 @@ static inline void ptep_set_wrprotect(st
>  })
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_PREFETCH
> +#define PTES_PER_LINE (L1_CACHE_BYTES / sizeof(pte_t))
> +#define PTE_LINE_MASK (~(PTES_PER_LINE - 1))
> +#define ADDR_PER_LINE (PTES_PER_LINE << PAGE_SHIFT)
> +#define ADDR_LINE_MASK (~(ADDR_PER_LINE - 1))
> +
> +#define pte_prefetch(pte, addr, end)					\
> +({									\
> +	unsigned long __nextline = ((addr) + ADDR_PER_LINE) & ADDR_LINE_MASK; \
> +	if (__nextline < (end))						\
> +		prefetch(pte + PTES_PER_LINE);				\
> +})
> +

are you sure this is right? at least on pc's having a branch predictor
miss is very expensive and might well be more expensive than the gain
you get from a prefetch



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-06  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-06  8:11 [rfc][patch 0/14] mm: performance improvements Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:20 ` [patch 1/14] mm: opt rmqueue Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:20   ` [patch 2/14] mm: Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:20   ` [patch 2/14] mm: pte prefetch Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:21     ` [patch 3/14] mm: release opt Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:22       ` [patch 4/14] mm: rmap opt Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:23         ` [patch 5/14] mm: set_page_refs opt Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:24           ` [patch 6/14] mm: microopt conditions Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:24             ` [patch 7/14] mm: remove bad_range Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:25               ` [patch 8/14] mm: remove pcp_low Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:25                 ` [patch 9/14] mm: page_state opt Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:26                   ` [patch 10/14] mm: single pcp list Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:26                     ` [patch 11/14] mm: increase pcp size Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:27                       ` [patch 12/14] mm: variable " Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:27                         ` [patch 13/14] mm: cleanup zone_pcp Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:28                           ` [patch 14/14] mm: page_alloc cleanups Nick Piggin
2005-11-13  2:38                   ` [patch 9/14] mm: page_state opt Andi Kleen
2005-11-06 17:37               ` [patch 7/14] mm: remove bad_range Bob Picco
2005-11-07  0:58                 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07  3:00                   ` Bob Picco
2005-11-07  3:05                     ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07  1:40           ` [patch 5/14] mm: set_page_refs opt Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-07  1:45             ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-06  8:35     ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2005-11-06  8:51       ` [patch 2/14] mm: pte prefetch Nick Piggin
2005-11-06 17:37   ` [patch 1/14] mm: opt rmqueue Andi Kleen
2005-11-07  1:06     ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07  3:23       ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-07  3:43         ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07  1:39 ` [rfc][patch 0/14] mm: performance improvements Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-07  1:51   ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07  3:57     ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07  4:51       ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1131266102.2826.3.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=Linux-Kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®